Catch our talk at TestCon Europe in Vilnius on October 23: measuring software quality through the human side of AI adoptionOur TestCon talk, Oct 23: the human side of AI adoption

AI Adoption Score vs Larridin

Larridin (larridin.com) measures AI from the work itself: a browser extension and a desktop agent record which apps people use, AI tools included, and it reads AI spend from your invoices and engineering output from your repositories. AI Adoption Score asks people how well they use AI and what holds back the ones who don't, with nothing to install. Here's how to choose, and when to use both.

Side by side

QuestionLarridin
What it measuresHow people adopt AI: a level for every person and team across usage, skills, impact, culture and vision (opens in a new tab)AI adoption, fluency, impact and spend across the company: who uses which AI tools, how well, the hours AI returns in each workflow, and the return on AI spend; plus engineering output and coding agents1, 2, 3, 6
AI tools coveredAny: Copilot, ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Cursor, and tools people pay for themselvesAI tools used on computers, approved or not, plus AI coding tools such as Cursor, Claude Code and GitHub Copilot2, 4
Where the data comes fromSurveys and short quizzes that people answerA browser extension and a desktop agent that record which apps are active, in what order and for how long; plus AI invoices, code repositories and, for engineers, quarterly surveys1, 4, 9
What you installNothing: no extension, no agent, no admin accessThe extension and agent on employees' computers, for the apps admins enable, plus connections to your identity, spend and code systems; the first report within two weeks1, 4, 10
Why people don't use AI18 barriers, each with who can fix it: IT, leadership, managers or training (opens in a new tab)Usage segments with what each needs, such as awareness for people who rarely use AI; it asks engineers about barriers in surveys, and observes everyone else1, 3, 9
AI skillsWho can do what with 125 AI tools and models, and quizzes that score n8n and Claude skills (opens in a new tab)Fluency scored from usage: how often and how deeply people use AI, and what for, compared by team3, 4
AttitudesAI anxiety on a validated research scale, plus culture and vision in the 360° (opens in a new tab)For engineers, survey questions such as whether AI tools save them time; it observes everyone else1, 9
LevelsL1 Observer to L5 Native for every person, team and the organizationFour usage segments, from Observers to Power Users; its proficiency guide adds five levels, from Search Replacer to AI-Native Orchestrator3, 11
BenchmarksNone from other companies yetPublished reports from its customers' data, such as AI coding spend per engineer7
PrivacyNamed or anonymous, set per survey; results from the first answer, with no minimum group sizeThe extension reads AI pages on the computer, prompts and replies included, and sends only the signals it derives; team views by default, views of one person off unless an admin turns them on; coding-agent transcripts only if enabled1, 12, 13
SecurityNo access to your systems; no SOC 2 or ISO certification yetSOC 2 Type 2, SOC 3, HIPAA and GDPR, per its Trust Center; on-premises hardware for highly regulated companies4, 8
PriceFree plan; paid plans on requestFrom $25,000 a year on an annual contract, priced on usage and seats5, 14

Where Larridin is stronger

  • Measured, not reported. It records AI use on every computer it's installed on, including AI tools nobody approved. We only know what people tell us, with checks.2, 4
  • AI in money. It prices AI spend from your invoices, estimates the hours AI returns in each workflow, and reports the return on that spend. We don't measure spend or return in dollars.1
  • Governance. It keeps an inventory of the AI tools in use, approved or not, and lets you set and enforce a policy for each.2
  • Engineering output. It reads your repositories, tells AI-written code from human code and tracks coding agents. We don't read code.4, 6
  • Published data. Regular reports from its customers' data, such as what engineers spend on AI each week. We have no cross-company data yet.7
  • Certifications. SOC 2 Type 2, SOC 3 and HIPAA, per its Trust Center. We have none yet.8

How we differ

We ask everyone why. Larridin's own developer page says usage data can't show what holds adoption back, so it surveys engineers. Everyone else, it observes. We ask every role: AI Adoption Barriers (opens in a new tab) names 18 barriers and who can fix each one, the AI Anxiety Scale (opens in a new tab) measures worries on a published research scale, and the 360° (opens in a new tab) adds culture and vision to usage and skills.1, 9

Nothing to install. No extension or agent goes on anyone's computer, and nothing records what people do: they choose to answer. There's no endpoint software for your security team to review.

Free to start. A free plan you can start without a sales call. Larridin starts at $25,000 a year.5

Questions

Are Larridin's segments and levels the same as yours?

No, though some names match. Larridin sorts people by how they use AI tools: its Observers have access but rarely use AI, and its proficiency guide's five levels run from Search Replacer to AI-Native Orchestrator. Our five levels, L1 Observer to L5 Native, come from people's answers about usage, skills, impact, culture and vision.3, 11

Larridin says surveys record what people remember saving. Why use one?

For hours saved, observed data is more precise than memory; the 360° asks people for their own estimate. But activity data can't show why someone doesn't use AI or what worries them; Larridin itself surveys engineers to find out. Our surveys ask every role. Larridin also says surveys get low response rates; here's how we get people to answer (opens in a new tab).1, 4, 9

Do you need to install anything?

No. People answer surveys and quizzes in the browser, and nothing is connected to your systems. More in Security and privacy (opens in a new tab).

Sources

  1. Larridin: AI Impact (opens in a new tab)
  2. Larridin: AI Adoption (opens in a new tab)
  3. Larridin: AI Fluency (opens in a new tab)
  4. Larridin: FAQ (opens in a new tab)
  5. Larridin: compare Larridin (opens in a new tab)
  6. Larridin: Developer Intelligence (opens in a new tab)
  7. Larridin Data: benchmarks and reports (opens in a new tab)
  8. Larridin Trust Center (opens in a new tab)
  9. Larridin: developer productivity, with its developer surveys (opens in a new tab)
  10. Larridin: the Okta integration (opens in a new tab)
  11. Larridin: AI proficiency, the complete enterprise guide (2026) (opens in a new tab)
  12. Larridin: deploying AI measurement without disrupting your workforce, March 2026 (opens in a new tab)
  13. Larridin: Agent Effectiveness (opens in a new tab)
  14. Larridin: Larridin vs DX (opens in a new tab)

See where your people stand on AI.

Start free with the 360° AI Maturity Assessment: about 15 minutes per person,
a live report from the first answer, and nothing to connect.